Leave a Message

Thank you for your message. We will be in touch with you shortly.

Woodward Boundary Study

Community Action Guide

The Superintendent’s recommendation creates new problems instead of solving overcrowding.

The Superintendent’s recommendation opens Woodward near capacity, keeps WJ underutilized, and ignores near-term growth—putting our students and schools at risk of immediate overcrowding and long-term instability.

 The Board of Education should reject this recommendation and require a revised plan that better balances utilization, stability, geography, and long-term planning under MCPS Policy FAA.

 

The Superintendent’s Articulation Recommendation

 
  • It does not reflect community feedback and survey data. In fact, the Superintendent created a new plan without community engagement. His recommendation is totally different from “Option B”
  • It creates two schools less than a mile apart, each with extremely different utilization rates and little room for enrollment growth. Woodward is projected to open near capacity, while WJ remains significantly underutilized despite many ongoing and planned development projects
  • This plan is less effective than the previously presented options. It fails to balance the factors that the Board of Education is required to consider as key priorities: facility utilization, geography, student assignment stability, and demographic characteristics
  • It unnecessarily splits up established communities & creates split articulation. Peer groups will be separated. There are more complex transitions from multiple feeder middle schools and a greater risk of students falling through the cracks during transitions

See the Original Boundary Study Options and the Superintendant’s Recommendation: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/facilities/boundary-study/

Take Action in 4 Easy Steps

  • Sign it
  • Share it to 5 people
  • Ask family and neighbors to sign

https://www.change.org/p/parity-and-equity-between-wj-and-woodward-hs

Write an email to the Board Members

 

Here's a suggested email template to use: 

Subject ideas:

  • Reject the Woodward boundary recommendation

  • Don’t open Woodward overcrowded

 

Dear Board Members,

I am a [parent/community member] in [neighborhood/school]. I urge you to reject the Superintendent’s recommendation for the Woodward boundary study.

This plan opens Woodward near capacity while keeping WJ significantly underutilized, leaving too little room for growth in a rapidly developing area. It also increases instability by creating additional split articulation patterns and more complex transitions for students and staff.

Please direct MCPS to produce a revised plan that better balances Policy FAA factors—utilization, stability, geography, and long-term planning—so Woodward truly solves overcrowding instead of inheriting it.

 

Here's the contact list of each Board Member:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/boe/members/

Even if you only reach staff, volume matters. 

  Reach the Office at 240-740-3030. 

Here is a suggested 20-second script:

“Hi, my name is ____. I’m a parent/community member in ____. I’m calling to ask the Board to reject the Superintendent’s Woodward boundary recommendation and require a revised plan that better balances utilization, stability, and long-term growth. Thank you.”

 

Your presence shows this affects real families, not just spreadsheets.

  • You do not need to speak to attend
  • Wear ORANGE to show unity

 

Be Smart About Your Messaging

  • Focus on: overcrowding, planning, stability, and process

  • Avoid: language that can be misread as being about who students are rather than how schools are being planned

The strongest argument: This plan creates overcrowding, instability, and poor long-term planning—and the Board can fix that by sending it back.

  UPCOMING KEY DATES  

  • Public Hearing #1
    •  Crown/Damascus
    • Monday | Feb. 23 | 5 PM
  • Public Hearing #2
    • Woodward/Northwood
    • Tuesday | Feb. 24 | 5 PM
  • Work Session #2
    • Tuesday | March 3 | 10 AM
  • Public Hearing #3
    • CIP
    • Monday | March 9 | 5 PM
  • Public Hearing #4
    • CIP
    • Tuesday | March 10 | 5 PM
  • Work Session #3
    • Thursday | March 12 | 10 AM

Scheduled board of education vote: Thursday, March 26, 2026

 

We are not opposing change.

However, this plan creates overcrowding, instability, and poor long-term planning—and the Board can fix that by sending it back. We are asking the Board to require a revised plan that:

  • Keeps Woodward from opening overcrowded
  • Accounts transparently for near-term development growth
  • Reduces unnecessary splits and instability
  • Better balances MCPS Policy FAA factors

Questions?

 

Call Nurit Coombe at 301.346.5252 or leave a message.

 

Image Form

Follow Me on Instagram